Download Aristotle's Ethics and Moral Responsibility by Javier Echeñique PDF

By Javier Echeñique

ISBN-10: 1107021588

ISBN-13: 9781107021587

Aristotle's Ethics develops a posh idea of the characteristics which make for a superb man or woman and for numerous many years there was severe dialogue approximately no matter if Aristotle's thought of voluntariness, defined within the Ethics, truly delineates what sleek thinkers may realize as a conception of ethical accountability.

Show description

Read or Download Aristotle's Ethics and Moral Responsibility PDF

Best philosophy books

Critique of Pure Reason

This completely new translation of Critique of natural cause is the main actual and informative English translation ever produced of this epochal philosophical textual content. even though its uncomplicated, direct kind will make it compatible for all new readers of Kant, the interpretation monitors a philosophical and textual sophistication that would enlighten Kant students to boot.

Milton Friedman (Major Conservative and Libertarian Thinker, Volume 19)

This is often quantity 20 within the "Major Conservative and Libertarian Thinkers" sequence. the yankee Milton Friedman (1912-2006) was once the chief of the Chicago tuition of economic economics. An unofficial consultant to Ronald Reagan, he promoted a loose marketplace economic climate with little intervention from the govt..

The Phenomenology of Religious Life (Studies in Continental Thought)

Name observe: unique name Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens

The Phenomenology of non secular lifestyles offers the textual content of Heidegger's vital 1920-21 lectures on faith. the quantity involves the well-known lecture direction creation to the Phenomenology of faith, a path on Augustine and Neoplatonism, and notes for a direction at the Philosophical Foundations of Medieval Mysticism that was once by no means introduced.

Heidegger's engagements with Aristotle, St. Paul, Augustine, and Luther provide readers a feeling of what phenomenology could come to intend within the mature expression of his proposal. Heidegger unearths a magnificent show of theological wisdom, preserving Christian lifestyles event from Greek philosophy and protecting Paul opposed to Nietzsche.

Carnets II : janvier 1942 - mars 1951

Poser los angeles query du monde absurde, c’est demander : “Allons-nous accepter le désespoir, sans rien faire ? ” Je believe que personne d’honnête ne peut répondre oui.

Entre 1942 et 1951, Albert Camus rédige, entre autres, los angeles Peste, Les Justes et L’Homme révolté. Si ce deuxième quantity des Carnets témoigne de ces créations en devenir, il accueille aussi les instants essentiels d’une vie et l’histoire en teach de se faire – l’épuration, los angeles guerre froide. .. . S’y révèlent une moral sense en motion, un homme dans toute sa fragilité, épris de beauté.

Additional resources for Aristotle's Ethics and Moral Responsibility

Example text

That is, if the offender is a member of the moral community. Strawson 1962: 89 (emphasis added). 30 Part I: Towards an account of ethical ascription satisfy this description in that they are not justified purely by instrumentalist considerations. Moreover, it can be noticed straight away that there are cases falling under (3) that do not do so either. For instance, in warning a prospective employer about S, I am not necessarily treating S in an ‘instrumentalist’ way. e. 31 Roberts’ own view – let us call it the ‘prospective conditioning view’ – is precisely that prospective praise and blame can account for this ‘curious fact’ (her words): Humans (or animals) are responsible for their voluntary actions in the sense that their particular desires are at least a crucial part of the explanation of what happens.

See also Irwin 2007: 178. Against the Strawsonian interpretation 29 and blame for which Aristotle thinks voluntariness is necessary might simply be tools of behavioural control and character formation justified by purely prospective considerations. 27 This way of framing the contrast between S-reactive and ‘objective’ attitudes is thoroughly warranted by Strawson’s own view, but it is misleading. As is clear from Protagoras’ celebrated theory of punishing for prospective reasons (Plato’s Protagoras 324a–c), prospectively praising and blaming an agent S for an action x are practices that seek: (1) to encourage S to perform, or to deter S from performing, actions relevantly similar to x in the future; or, alternatively, (2) to increase or decrease the probability of the performance of the same type of actions as performed by others.

If this is the case, then the following passage of the Ethica Nicomachea explains why non-human animals are not moral agents: We do not call beasts either temperate or intemperate, except metaphorically when one kind of animal differs from another in violence and wantonness and in being ravenous. 39 (EN 1149b31–1150a1) Commenting on this passage, however, Sauv´e Meyer says: ‘The reason Aristotle gives here for excluding non-human animals and the insane from 38 Sauv´e Meyer 1993: 23. 39 Ibid. 23.

Download PDF sample

Aristotle's Ethics and Moral Responsibility by Javier Echeñique

by Brian

Rated 4.50 of 5 – based on 30 votes